IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Edwards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-06 Country: Canada
2020 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #120  ·  New Jersey Devils New Jersey Devils
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — AJHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0332 0.0372 0.0927 0.1040
2019-20 — AJHL 50 9 24 33 0.660 0.2190 0.2190 0.6117 0.6117
2020-21 — USHL 51 6 21 27 0.529 0.3254 0.3254 1.5597 1.5597
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 36 5 16 21 0.583
2023-24 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 21 3 7 10 0.476
2022-23 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 37 4 10 14 0.378
2021-22 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 36 3 8 11 0.306
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2021-22 · Michigan
+770.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

John MacLeod
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Boston University (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Billitier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Bliss
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Cornell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Louie Belpedio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Collins
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rob Sgarbossa
SUNY Morrisville · 2002-03
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Walker
Utica · 2013-14
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jody Sullivan
SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.