← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bobby Lipsett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-03-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 39 5 3 8 0.205 0.0790 0.0842 0.2985 0.3183
2007-08 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 48 6 6 12 0.250 0.0963 0.0975 0.3638 0.3683
2008-09 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 60 11 16 27 0.450 0.1734 0.1683 0.6549 0.6355
2009-10 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 60 5 15 20 0.333 0.1284 0.1176 0.4851 0.4442
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 20 4 3 7 0.350
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 18 2 2 4 0.222
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 21 1 4 5 0.238
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 11 1 0 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2010-11 · St. Scholastica
-30.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12872
Defenseman overall
#1340
Defenseman born in 1989
#2284
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.