IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-04 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #67  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Marks NE-Prep 28 9 7 16 0.571 0.1612 0.1612 0.2615 0.2615
2019-20 St. Marks NE-Prep 27 11 27 38 1.407 0.3970 0.3970 — —
2020-21 — USHL 45 10 14 24 0.533 0.3278 0.3278 1.5712 1.5712
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Harvard D1 ECAC SR 32 3 11 14 0.438
2023-24 Harvard D1 ECAC JR 21 3 5 8 0.381
2022-23 Harvard D1 ECAC SO 34 1 18 19 0.559
2021-22 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 35 2 13 15 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2021-22 · Harvard
+50.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
75%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2851
Defenseman overall
#738
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Will Butcher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clark Kuster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.30 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Sciore
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Murray
Daniel Webster · 2011-12
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Pitoscia
Adrian · 2018-19
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.