IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Pitoscia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 22 0 6 6 0.273 0.0762 0.0788 0.1882 0.1945
2019-20 — OJHL 31 5 20 25 0.806 0.2253 0.2253 0.5566 0.5566
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 11 2 8 10 0.909 0.2562 0.2562 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 29 13 11 24 0.828
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 32 14 10 24 0.750
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 28 14 15 29 1.036
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 28 15 12 27 0.964
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2021-22 · Adrian
+1328.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19485
Forward overall
#610
Forward born in 2000
#1429
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Haak
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brady Ferguson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Smith
Bethel · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Stephen Ginand
UMass Dartmouth · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Gow
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.345 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.