IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Dobles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-09-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rochester Rivermen NA3HL 15 6 5 11 0.733 0.0920 0.1008 0.2315 0.2537
2018-19 — USPHL-Elite 35 5 12 17 0.486 0.0448 0.0450 0.1112 0.1117
2019-20 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 41 2 4 6 0.146 0.0191 0.0191 0.0497 0.0497
2020-21 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 35 1 11 12 0.343 0.0449 0.0449 0.1164 0.1164
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wilkes D3 MAC — 25 1 3 4 0.160
2023-24 Wilkes D3 MAC — 25 2 0 2 0.080
2022-23 Wilkes D3 MAC — 14 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
90%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19387
Defenseman overall
#2917
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Dann
Wilkes · 2022-23
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Todd Gilmore
Neumann · 2003-04
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Antiles
Middlebury · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.