IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Antiles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New Jersey Rockets EHLP 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 11 1 2 3 0.273 0.0455 0.0473 0.1135 0.1180
2019-20 — NCDC 51 3 26 29 0.569 0.2318 0.2318 0.4570 0.4570
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Middlebury D3 NESCAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Middlebury D3 NESCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5285
Defenseman overall
#1112
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Longley
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Skaja
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Herpy
Albertus Magnus · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.