IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Zwiener Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Sartell-St. Stephen High USHS-MN 25 25 33 58 2.320 0.6245 0.5790 0.5635 0.5225
2015-16 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 24 2 7 9 0.375 0.1486 0.1499 0.3937 0.3972
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 53 6 12 18 0.340 0.1345 0.1284 0.3565 0.3403
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 — SR 9 6 2 8 0.889
2019-20 St. Thomas D3 — JR 27 6 6 12 0.444
2018-19 St. Thomas D3 — SO 16 0 3 3 0.188
2017-18 St. Thomas D3 — FR 19 0 1 1 0.053
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2017-18 · St. Thomas
-55.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33284
Forward overall
#1417
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brady Plaza
Salve Regina · 2025-26
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Riddell
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Reif
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.