IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Skaja Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.0628 0.0654 0.1578 0.1643
2014-15 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 46 14 34 48 1.044 0.1310 0.1300 0.3294 0.3269
2015-16 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 45 20 30 50 1.111 0.1394 0.1316 0.3508 0.3311
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 23 2 8 10 0.435
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 25 2 4 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Superior
+114.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21546
Forward overall
#802
Forward born in 1995
#486
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Fackey
New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Brazier
Middlebury · 2008-09
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wally Cossette
Saint John's · 2010-11
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.