IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Sciore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.1397 0.1441 0.3451 0.3560
2017-18 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 53 11 22 33 0.623 0.1740 0.1711 0.4297 0.4226
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 26 8 16 24 0.923
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 — SO 12 0 4 4 0.333
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 23 5 7 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2018-19 · SUNY Cortland
+280.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23798
Forward overall
#970
Forward born in 1998
#1936
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Fritz
Saint John's · 2013-14
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zilka
Hamline · 2005-06
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Talon Medure
Saint Mary's · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.