IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Helfrich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-07-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Calgary Royals AJHL 55 9 15 24 0.436 0.1464 0.1576 0.4038 0.4347
2005-06 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 51 17 38 55 1.078 0.3617 0.3722 0.9980 1.0269
2006-07 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 43 18 32 50 1.163 0.3900 0.3833 1.0761 1.0577
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 RPI D1 ECAC SR 38 14 24 38 1.000
2009-10 RPI D1 ECAC JR 26 5 11 16 0.615
2008-09 RPI D1 ECAC SO 33 5 18 23 0.697
2007-08 RPI D1 ECAC FR 38 9 20 29 0.763
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2007-08 · RPI
+135.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5129
Forward overall
#200
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brody Simko
Trine · 2023-24
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morton
Curry · 2023-24
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Enns
Marian · 2017-18
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.