IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Schultz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-07-06 Country: Canada
2008 · Round 2, Pick #43  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1926 0.2176 0.7277 0.8223
2007-08 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 57 9 31 40 0.702 0.2704 0.2910 1.0213 1.0990
2008-09 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 49 15 35 50 1.020 0.3932 0.4066 1.4850 1.5356
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-orig JR 37 16 28 44 1.189
2010-11 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-orig SO 41 18 29 47 1.146
2009-10 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 43 6 16 22 0.512
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2009-10 · Wisconsin
+50.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2679
Defenseman overall
#539
Defenseman born in 1990
#474
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Collin Patterson
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
James Tatro
Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.