← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stan Cooley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 56 8 11 19 0.339 0.1138 0.1275 0.3140 0.3518
2019-20 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 56 15 29 44 0.786 0.2635 0.2635 0.7271 0.7271
2020-21 Lincoln Stars USHL 49 7 12 19 0.388 0.2288 0.2288 1.1647 1.1647
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Colorado College D1 NCHC SR 37 6 6 12 0.324
2023-24 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 37 5 9 14 0.378
2022-23 Colorado College D1 NCHC SO 38 6 14 20 0.526
2021-22 Colorado College D1 NCHC FR 36 6 12 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2021-22 · Colorado College
+358.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25927
Forward overall
#1457
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ American International (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2005-06
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.