← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Kavanagh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-04-21 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Toronto Metro Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Oshawa Generals OHL 17 1 0 1 0.059 0.0340 0.0373 0.1511 0.1659
2004-05 Oshawa Generals OHL 57 8 6 14 0.246 0.1421 0.1486 0.6311 0.6601
2005-06 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 37 20 29 49 1.324 0.3246 0.3250 0.9118 0.9130
2006-07 Toronto Metro Univ. USports-M 28 12 12 24 0.857 0.4522 0.5221 2.5122 2.9006
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 3 0 2 2 0.667
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 21 5 5 10 0.476
2008-09 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 19 4 6 10 0.526
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2008-09 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+38.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10761
Forward overall
#373
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.