| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Oshawa Generals | OHL | 17 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.059 | 0.0340 | 0.0373 | 0.1511 | 0.1659 |
| 2004-05 | Oshawa Generals | OHL | 57 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.246 | 0.1421 | 0.1486 | 0.6311 | 0.6601 |
| 2005-06 | Bowmanville Eagles | OJHL | 37 | 20 | 29 | 49 | 1.324 | 0.3246 | 0.3250 | 0.9118 | 0.9130 |
| 2006-07 | Toronto Metro Univ. | USports-M | 28 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 0.857 | 0.4522 | 0.5221 | 2.5122 | 2.9006 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | SUNYAC | JR | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.667 |
| 2009-10 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | SUNYAC | SO | 21 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.476 |
| 2008-09 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 19 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.526 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.