← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-12-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Portage Terriers MJHL 55 9 32 41 0.746 0.1435 0.1656 0.4698 0.5423
2019-20 Portage Terriers MJHL 30 4 22 26 0.867 0.1668 0.1668 0.5462 0.5462
2020-21 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 35 3 13 16 0.457 0.2696 0.2696 1.3467 1.3467
2021-22 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 6 16 22 0.355 0.2093 0.2054 1.0453 1.0258
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass D1 HockeyEast SR 34 4 6 10 0.294
2024-25 UMass D1 HockeyEast 40 5 9 14 0.350
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 40 5 9 14 0.350
2023-24 UMass D1 HockeyEast 31 2 7 9 0.290
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 31 2 7 9 0.290
2022-23 UMass D1 HockeyEast 21 1 2 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · UMass
-20.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4654
Defenseman overall
#1216
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2017-18
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2017-18
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.