← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erik Bargholtz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 10 2 1 3 0.300 0.1673 0.1906 0.2426 0.2764
2018-19 Janesville Jets NAHL 54 6 12 18 0.333 0.1321 0.1437 0.3499 0.3807
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 52 12 18 30 0.577 0.2286 0.2286 0.6057 0.6057
2020-21 Fargo Force USHL 30 6 6 12 0.400 0.2459 0.2459 1.1785 1.1785
2021-22 Fargo Force USHL 60 10 13 23 0.383 0.2356 0.2119 1.1293 1.0158
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 38 8 12 20 0.526
2024-25 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 39 6 7 13 0.333
2023-24 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 29 4 5 9 0.310
2022-23 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 33 3 2 5 0.151
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · Clarkson
-4.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22789
Forward overall
#1127
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.