IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac MacLeod Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-02-22 Country: Canada
2010 · Round 5, Pick #136  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Penticton Vees BCHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1284 0.1433 0.4851 0.5412
2009-10 Penticton Vees BCHL 56 0 23 23 0.411 0.1582 0.1679 0.5977 0.6342
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 40 0 11 11 0.275
2012-13 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 36 2 5 7 0.194
2011-12 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 44 0 6 6 0.136
2010-11 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 22 0 3 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2010-11 · Boston College
-8.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10513
Defenseman overall
#1378
Defenseman born in 1992
#2046
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Mark Auk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Roy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Stander
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2004-05
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Bond
Hamline · 2013-14
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.