IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Carlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-06-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Houston Bulls NAHL 46 1 8 9 0.196 0.0719 0.0752 0.2066 0.2162
2019-20 Houston Bulls NAHL 50 12 18 30 0.600 0.2204 0.2204 0.6333 0.6333
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 45 2 9 11 0.244 0.1442 0.1442 0.7340 0.7340
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Niagara D1 AHA SR 37 4 3 7 0.189
2023-24 Niagara D1 AHA JR 27 3 9 12 0.444
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA SO 33 1 11 12 0.364
2021-22 Niagara D1 AHA FR 22 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9579
Defenseman overall
#1789
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Gauld
Concordia · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Donovan Hall
Neumann · 2002-03
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Challier
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.