IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Switzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 57 31 30 61 1.070 0.3551 0.3660 0.9919 1.0225
2009-10 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 44 13 14 27 0.614 0.2036 0.1995 0.5687 0.5571
2010-11 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 45 26 26 52 1.156 0.3834 0.3555 1.0710 0.9929
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Bentley D1 AHA SR 35 10 16 26 0.743
2013-14 Bentley D1 AHA JR 37 11 19 30 0.811
2012-13 Bentley D1 AHA SO 35 10 11 21 0.600
2011-12 Bentley D1 — FR 39 14 19 33 0.846
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2011-12 · Bentley
+237.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13910
Forward overall
#568
Forward born in 1990
#266
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tommy Besinger
Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Francis Rose
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.