← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Switzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 57 31 30 61 1.070 0.3589 0.3700 0.9904 1.0209
2009-10 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 44 13 14 27 0.614 0.2058 0.2016 0.5678 0.5562
2010-11 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 45 26 26 52 1.156 0.3876 0.3593 1.0694 0.9914
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Bentley D1 AHA SR 35 10 16 26 0.743
2013-14 Bentley D1 AHA JR 37 11 19 30 0.811
2012-13 Bentley D1 AHA SO 35 10 11 21 0.600
2011-12 Bentley D1 AHA FR 39 14 19 33 0.846
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2011-12 · Bentley
+233.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14469
Forward overall
#586
Forward born in 1990
#234
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.