← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Evans Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Surrey Eagles BCHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0466 0.0521 0.1821 0.2037
2019-20 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 57 22 28 50 0.877 0.3268 0.3268 1.2782 1.2782
2020-21 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 22 3 6 9 0.409 0.2515 0.2515 1.2053 1.2053
2021-22 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 47 19 29 48 1.021 0.3804 0.3683 1.4881 1.4406
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Lindenwood D1 CCHA 28 4 8 12 0.429
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC 16 4 6 10 0.625
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC 29 5 3 8 0.276
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2022-23 · RPI
+33.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13330
Forward overall
#667
Forward born in 2002
#534
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2001-02
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.