| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 49 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.143 | 0.0532 | 0.0570 | 0.2082 | 0.2229 |
| 2010-11 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 51 | 13 | 20 | 33 | 0.647 | 0.2410 | 0.2467 | 0.9429 | 0.9654 |
| 2011-12 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 55 | 38 | 50 | 88 | 1.600 | 0.5960 | 0.5775 | 2.3314 | 2.2589 |
| 2019-20 | Iserlohn Roosters | DEL | 50 | 8 | 19 | 27 | 0.540 | 0.5905 | 0.5905 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Michigan Tech | D1 | WCHA | SR | 36 | 18 | 15 | 33 | 0.917 |
| 2014-15 | Michigan Tech | D1 | WCHA | JR | 41 | 15 | 25 | 40 | 0.976 |
| 2013-14 | Michigan Tech | D1 | WCHA | SO | 39 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 0.718 |
| 2012-13 | Michigan | D1 | CCHA-orig | — | 37 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 0.919 |
| 2012-13 | Michigan Tech | D1 | — | FR | 37 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 0.919 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.