← New Search ↗ Social Card

Myles Fitzgerald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-26 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 9 2 2 4 0.444 0.1712 0.1946 0.6458 0.7340
2010-11 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 10 11 21 0.350 0.1349 0.1470 0.5086 0.5542
2011-12 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 59 20 20 40 0.678 0.2612 0.2703 0.9852 1.0194
2012-13 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 52 30 41 71 1.365 0.5261 0.5195 1.9841 1.9592
2013-14 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 58 27 56 83 1.431 0.5514 0.5190 2.0794 1.9572
2019-20 DEL2 16 7 9 16 1.000 1.3396 1.3396 1.7941 1.7941
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SR 29 7 5 12 0.414
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 35 6 12 18 0.514
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 20 6 1 7 0.350
2014-15 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 30 4 5 9 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2014-15 · Bemidji State
-37.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6219
Forward overall
#283
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.