← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andon Cerbone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Brunswick NE-Prep 23 0 1 1 0.043 0.0086 0.0086 0.0198 0.0198
2019-20 Brunswick NE-Prep 30 7 27 34 1.133 0.2245 0.2245 0.5163 0.5163
2020-21 Chicago Steel USHL 30 2 5 7 0.233 0.1376 0.1376 0.7007 0.7007
2021-22 Chicago Steel USHL 61 11 27 38 0.623 0.3675 0.3858 1.8711 1.9640
2022-23 USHL 64 24 39 63 0.984 0.5807 0.5793 2.9565 2.9495
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 40 9 13 22 0.550
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 38 15 20 35 0.921
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 39 12 14 26 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2023-24 · Quinnipiac
+42.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

95%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7989
Forward overall
#281
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.