IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Wheeler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-09-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 5 2 2 4 0.800 0.2939 0.2939 0.8444 0.8444
2020-21 Tri-City Storm USHL 39 1 6 7 0.179 0.1059 0.1059 0.5391 0.5391
2021-22 Tri-City Storm USHL 53 4 7 11 0.207 0.1224 0.1129 0.6232 0.5751
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CCHA SR 40 1 8 9 0.225
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 39 0 6 6 0.154
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 37 1 4 5 0.135
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 37 0 5 5 0.135
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Minnesota
+26.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13890
Defenseman overall
#2377
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Parker Wood
Endicott · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Dunaiski
Concordia · 2024-25
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Carpinone
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.