IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bennett Hambrook Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-03-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 — BCHL 33 1 1 2 0.061 0.0233 0.0237 0.0881 0.0897
2011-12 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 51 2 3 5 0.098 0.0378 0.0364 0.1424 0.1371
2012-13 — BCHL 49 1 10 11 0.225 0.0865 0.0792 0.3262 0.2986
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 21 0 2 2 0.095
2014-15 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 24 0 6 6 0.250
2013-14 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 20 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#25210
Defenseman overall
#2222
Defenseman born in 1992
#3226
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Walker
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Trujillo
Curry · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vinny Muchalla
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.