IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy Stecher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-04-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — BCHL 54 5 15 20 0.370 0.1427 0.1599 0.5390 0.6038
2011-12 — BCHL 53 5 37 42 0.792 0.3054 0.3254 1.1533 1.2287
2012-13 — BCHL 52 8 39 47 0.904 0.3482 0.3545 1.3153 1.3391
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 43 8 21 29 0.674
2014-15 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 34 3 10 13 0.382
2013-14 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 42 2 9 11 0.262
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2013-14 · North Dakota
-19.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3727
Defenseman overall
#723
Defenseman born in 1994
#820
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Cooper
King's · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Daigle
Marian · 2000-01
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Petriello
Buffalo State · 2004-05
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.