IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mikey Adamson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 41 0 5 5 0.122 0.0720 0.0720 0.3661 0.3661
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 29 1 12 13 0.448 0.2645 0.2425 1.3452 1.2332
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 40 4 30 34 0.850
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 37 12 15 27 0.730
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 34 4 16 20 0.588
2022-23 UMass D1 HockeyEast — 11 1 1 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2022-23 · UMass
-20.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7397
Defenseman overall
#1586
Defenseman born in 2001
#3003
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Santopaolo
Aurora · 2013-14
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Savel
Utica · 2017-18
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Spagnuolo
Adrian · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.