← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 29 8 18 26 0.897 0.1776 0.1776 0.4085 0.4085
2019-20 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 56 9 28 37 0.661 0.2546 0.2546 0.9615 0.9615
2020-21 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 16 3 1 4 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7509 0.7509
2021-22 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.0536 0.0484 0.2730 0.2465
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 North Dakota D1 NCHC 32 5 7 12 0.375
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast GR 29 6 4 10 0.345
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2022-23 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Potsdam D1 SR 27 5 13 18 0.667
2018-19 Potsdam D1 JR 25 6 14 20 0.800

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35827
Forward overall
#1939
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.