← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 29 8 18 26 0.897 0.2529 0.2529 0.4103 0.4103
2019-20 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 56 9 28 37 0.661 0.2461 0.2461 0.9627 0.9627
2020-21 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 16 3 1 4 0.250 0.1537 0.1537 0.7366 0.7366
2021-22 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.0559 0.0505 0.2678 0.2418
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 North Dakota D1 NCHC 32 5 7 12 0.375
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast GR 29 6 4 10 0.345
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2022-23 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Potsdam D1 SR 27 5 13 18 0.667
2018-19 Potsdam D1 JR 25 6 14 20 0.800

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35890
Forward overall
#1954
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2012-13
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.