IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Pickering Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Seguin Bruins OJHL 47 0 7 7 0.149 0.0365 0.0367 0.1019 0.1024
2010-11 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 22 3 2 5 0.227 0.0807 0.0796 0.2386 0.2354
2011-12 Soo Eagles NOJHL 49 8 22 30 0.612 0.0872 0.0809 0.2540 0.2355
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Canton D3 — SR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2014-15 Canton D3 — JR 21 3 6 9 0.429
2013-14 Canton D3 — SO 19 0 1 1 0.053
2012-13 Canton D3 — FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#16223
Defenseman overall
#1630
Defenseman born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Volmert
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Herzberg
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2022-23
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Howell
Post · 2021-22
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.