← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kajon McKay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Portage Terriers MJHL 55 10 14 24 0.436 0.0840 0.0947 0.2752 0.3104
2009-10 Portage Terriers MJHL 48 6 28 34 0.708 0.1363 0.1476 0.4467 0.4838
2010-11 Portage Terriers MJHL 41 5 24 29 0.707 0.1362 0.1409 0.4460 0.4614
2011-12 Portage Terriers MJHL 58 21 40 61 1.052 0.2025 0.1993 0.6632 0.6527
2012-13 Portage Terriers MJHL 47 13 28 41 0.872 0.1679 0.1569 0.5501 0.5141
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC 2 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC 9 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2013-14 · Neumann
+83.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22396
Forward overall
#822
Forward born in 1992
#221
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.