← New Search ↗ Social Card

Curtis Hammond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 36 4 11 15 0.417 0.1392 0.1392 0.3868 0.3868
2020-21 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0607 0.0607 0.1688 0.1688
2021-22 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 56 28 22 50 0.893 0.2580 0.2413 0.6722 0.6286
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 30 7 15 22 0.733
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 25 6 8 14 0.560
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 19 5 3 8 0.421
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 26 7 8 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2022-23 · St. Norbert
+179.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24666
Forward overall
#936
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2002-03
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.