← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Ross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Portage Terriers MJHL 51 9 7 16 0.314 0.0604 0.0624 0.1978 0.2045
2014-15 Portage Terriers MJHL 20 4 3 7 0.350 0.0674 0.0662 0.2207 0.2167
2015-16 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 38 12 6 18 0.474 0.0912 0.0847 0.2987 0.2776
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Marian D1 NCHA SR 24 5 7 12 0.500
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA 24 5 7 12 0.500
2018-19 St. Scholastica D1 MIAC JR 23 2 5 7 0.304
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC GR 23 2 5 7 0.304
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 26 5 5 10 0.385
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 18 3 2 5 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2016-17 · St. Scholastica
+319.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#45118
Forward overall
#1941
Forward born in 1995
#1176
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2023-24
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.