← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Eisele Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 51 18 25 43 0.843 0.3340 0.3340 0.8852 0.8852
2020-21 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 8 2 2 4 0.500 0.3074 0.3074 1.4731 1.4731
2021-22 Penticton Vees BCHL 27 13 13 26 0.963 0.3587 0.3340 1.4032 1.3064
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 36 13 7 20 0.556
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen GR 37 13 13 26 0.703
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 37 8 15 23 0.622
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 33 4 6 10 0.303
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2022-23 · Minnesota
+6.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11755
Forward overall
#517
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2014-15
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.