IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Hills Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-10-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 56 15 18 33 0.589 0.2271 0.2252 0.8587 0.8516
2012-13 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 45 12 22 34 0.756 0.2911 0.2749 1.1010 1.0398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 25 13 12 25 1.000
2015-16 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 26 22 18 40 1.538
2014-15 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 26 8 8 16 0.615
2013-14 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2013-14 · St. Lawrence
-49.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20386
Forward overall
#755
Forward born in 1992
#1009
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Klugerman
Concordia (WI) · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Acorn
Elmira · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.