IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathieu Tibbet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 34 9 6 15 0.441 0.1700 0.1769 0.6421 0.6681
2012-13 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 42 5 7 12 0.286 0.1101 0.1094 0.4158 0.4130
2013-14 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 58 31 23 54 0.931 0.3587 0.3397 1.3549 1.2831
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 21 0 2 2 0.095
2016-17 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 34 5 4 9 0.265
2015-16 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 19 6 2 8 0.421
2014-15 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 35 6 8 14 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2014-15 · Merrimack
+88.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24187
Forward overall
#843
Forward born in 1993
#1258
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kowin Belsterling
Chatham · 2024-25
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.