IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Colten Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Coquitlam Express BCHL 56 2 7 9 0.161 0.0619 0.0622 0.2339 0.2350
2012-13 Wellington Dukes OJHL 49 1 15 16 0.327 0.0800 0.0759 0.2248 0.2134
2013-14 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 32 1 3 4 0.125 0.0306 0.0275 0.0861 0.0773
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 11 1 5 6 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2014-15 · Westfield State
+1134.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23812
Defenseman overall
#2118
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Conlon
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt McNamee
SUNY Cortland · 2009-10
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam MacBean
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.