← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam MacBean Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-01-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 51 1 5 6 0.118 0.0390 0.0393 0.1090 0.1098
2017-18 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 0 4 4 0.074 0.0276 0.0265 0.1080 0.1039
2018-19 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 58 1 10 11 0.190 0.0707 0.0642 0.2764 0.2509
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 21 2 4 6 0.286
2021-22 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 18 0 1 1 0.056
2020-21 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamilton D1 FR 16 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 16 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26086
Defenseman overall
#3241
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tufts · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Webster · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.