← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 50 7 16 23 0.460 0.1127 0.1114 0.3166 0.3129
2010-11 Powell River Kings BCHL 57 5 15 20 0.351 0.1352 0.1296 0.5103 0.4890
2011-12 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 7 29 36 0.621 0.2392 0.2161 0.9027 0.8154
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 31 1 3 4 0.129
2015-16 Daniel Webster D3 — FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 32 0 2 2 0.062
2013-14 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 34 0 4 4 0.118
2012-13 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 31 0 2 2 0.065
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2012-13 · Alaska Anchorage
-62.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8469
Defenseman overall
#1102
Defenseman born in 1991

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2017-18
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.