← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 50 7 16 23 0.460 0.1285 0.1270 0.3174 0.3137
2010-11 Powell River Kings BCHL 57 5 15 20 0.351 0.1366 0.1309 0.5117 0.4903
2011-12 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 7 29 36 0.621 0.2416 0.2182 0.9052 0.8177
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 31 1 3 4 0.129
2015-16 Daniel Webster D3 FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 32 0 2 2 0.062
2013-14 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 34 0 4 4 0.118
2012-13 Alaska Anchorage D1 FR 31 0 2 2 0.065
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2012-13 · Alaska Anchorage
-62.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4981
Defenseman overall
#882
Defenseman born in 1991

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.