| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Hamilton Red Wings | OJHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2009-10 | Hamilton Red Wings | OJHL | 50 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 0.460 | 0.1285 | 0.1270 | 0.3174 | 0.3137 |
| 2010-11 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 57 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 0.351 | 0.1366 | 0.1309 | 0.5117 | 0.4903 |
| 2011-12 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 58 | 7 | 29 | 36 | 0.621 | 0.2416 | 0.2182 | 0.9052 | 0.8177 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Alaska Anchorage | D1 | WCHA | SR | 31 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.129 |
| 2015-16 | Daniel Webster | D3 | — | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2014-15 | Alaska Anchorage | D1 | WCHA | JR | 32 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.062 |
| 2013-14 | Alaska Anchorage | D1 | WCHA | SO | 34 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.118 |
| 2012-13 | Alaska Anchorage | D1 | — | FR | 31 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.065 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.