IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Chevrier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-28 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Queen's Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Surrey Eagles BCHL 26 0 3 3 0.115 0.0445 0.0448 0.1679 0.1689
2012-13 Surrey Eagles BCHL 32 1 3 4 0.125 0.0482 0.0462 0.1819 0.1744
2013-14 Brooks Bandits AJHL 52 2 12 14 0.269 0.0903 0.0819 0.2491 0.2260
2014-15 Queen's Univ. USports-M 20 0 1 1 0.050 0.0264 0.0278 0.1466 0.1545
2015-16 Queen's Univ. USports-M 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#25870
Defenseman overall
#2228
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Rivers
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Curtis Harvey
St. Olaf · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Lenius
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.