| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Andover | USHS-MN | 29 | 22 | 16 | 38 | 1.310 | 0.3527 | 0.3527 | 0.3183 | 0.3183 |
| 2020-21 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.250 | 0.1537 | 0.1537 | 0.7366 | 0.7366 |
| 2021-22 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 60 | 28 | 18 | 46 | 0.767 | 0.4713 | 0.4708 | 2.2589 | 2.2563 |
| 2022-23 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 57 | 28 | 24 | 52 | 0.912 | 0.5608 | 0.5310 | 2.6878 | 2.5449 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | JR | 40 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 0.675 |
| 2024-25 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | JR | 36 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 0.556 |
| 2023-24 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | SO | 41 | 16 | 18 | 34 | 0.829 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.