IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Ustaski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-27 Country: USA
2014 · Round 6, Pick #192  ·  Winnipeg Jets Winnipeg Jets
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Langley Rivermen BCHL 55 11 16 27 0.491 0.1891 0.1938 0.7144 0.7322
2013-14 Langley Rivermen BCHL 54 29 20 49 0.907 0.3496 0.3422 1.3205 1.2925
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2016-17 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 27 6 2 8 0.296
2015-16 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 25 2 0 2 0.080
2014-15 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 24 4 4 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2014-15 · Wisconsin
+37.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18689
Forward overall
#740
Forward born in 1994
#859
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2008-09
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Perkins
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2002-03
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.