← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chad Staley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 56 9 18 27 0.482 0.1858 0.1913 0.7016 0.7223
2013-14 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 58 29 33 62 1.069 0.4119 0.4050 1.5557 1.5297
2014-15 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 59 22 36 58 0.983 0.3788 0.3548 1.4307 1.3401
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SR 33 2 9 11 0.333
2017-18 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA JR 36 4 14 18 0.500
2016-17 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SO 36 8 13 21 0.583
2015-16 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 22 3 2 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2015-16 · Alaska Fairbanks
-29.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13268
Forward overall
#559
Forward born in 1994
#464
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2003-04
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.