IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremiah Luedtke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 48 7 15 22 0.458 0.1766 0.1839 0.6670 0.6946
2013-14 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 58 13 42 55 0.948 0.3654 0.3636 1.3801 1.3735
2014-15 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 58 21 46 67 1.155 0.4451 0.4222 1.6812 1.5947
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 33 7 3 10 0.303
2017-18 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 24 4 7 11 0.458
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 27 2 6 8 0.296
2015-16 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 30 2 10 12 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2015-16 · Alaska Anchorage
+17.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12348
Forward overall
#519
Forward born in 1994
#410
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Boyd Stahlbaum
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Marra
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.