IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corey Renwick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — BCHL 26 1 4 5 0.192 0.0748 0.0798 0.2804 0.2991
2013-14 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 3 6 9 0.170 0.0661 0.0675 0.2476 0.2527
2014-15 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 43 4 11 15 0.349 0.1358 0.1323 0.5087 0.4954
2015-16 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 52 9 20 29 0.558 0.2171 0.1998 0.8133 0.7485
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 24 2 1 3 0.125
2018-19 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 34 1 3 4 0.118
2017-18 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 30 1 0 1 0.033
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 20 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#26465
Forward overall
#1078
Forward born in 1995
#2314
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Noonan
Southern Maine · 2022-23
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kimball
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Monreal
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.