IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corey Renwick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — BCHL 26 1 4 5 0.192 0.0741 0.0790 0.2799 0.2986
2013-14 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 3 6 9 0.170 0.0654 0.0667 0.2471 0.2522
2014-15 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 43 4 11 15 0.349 0.1344 0.1309 0.5076 0.4943
2015-16 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 52 9 20 29 0.558 0.2149 0.1978 0.8116 0.7469
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 24 2 1 3 0.125
2018-19 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 34 1 3 4 0.118
2017-18 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 30 1 0 1 0.033
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 20 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#36790
Forward overall
#1510
Forward born in 1995
#2076
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kimball
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Monreal
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Kemp
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.