IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Borst Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Edina USHS-MN 27 14 7 21 0.778 0.0958 0.0958 0.1888 0.1888
2020-21 Fargo Force USHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.4969 1.4969
2021-22 — NAHL 25 1 2 3 0.120 0.0426 0.0439 0.1266 0.1306
2022-23 — NCDC 38 10 9 19 0.500 0.1155 0.1139 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 28 7 18 25 0.893
2024-25 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 25 3 8 11 0.440
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 15 3 3 6 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2023-24 · Saint John's
+444.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29933
Forward overall
#1737
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Petr Staif
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Dennis
Concordia (WI) · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Davis
Nazareth · 2015-16
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.