← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-02-03 Country: USA
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Elite 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.0465 0.0476 0.1145 0.1173
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 21 1 3 4 0.191 0.0467 0.0443 0.1311 0.1243
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 22 1 3 4 0.182
2018-19 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 12 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 19 3 2 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2017-18 · Nazareth
+510.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19617
Defenseman overall
#2589
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
SJHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
WHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2018-19
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.