IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danys Chartrand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 37 0 4 4 0.108 0.0277 0.0284 0.0813 0.0833
2013-14 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 56 8 14 22 0.393 0.1007 0.0978 0.2956 0.2872
2014-15 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 53 3 21 24 0.453 0.1160 0.1066 0.3407 0.3131
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 North Dakota D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 North Dakota D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#15784
Defenseman overall
#1823
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Stubbings
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Dale
Utica · 2004-05
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Williams
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2009-10
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.