IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Fraccaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 47 10 21 31 0.660 0.1102 0.1100 0.2746 0.2740
2022-23 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 58 21 33 54 0.931 0.1555 0.1485 0.3876 0.3702
2023-24 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 58 23 38 61 1.052 0.1756 0.1585 0.4378 0.3952
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 10 2 1 3 0.300
2024-25 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 10 2 1 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2024-25 · Morrisville
+126.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25502
Forward overall
#1420
Forward born in 2003
#203
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cody Symonds
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kaden Milles
Beloit · 2024-25
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sheldon Kwiatkowski
Marian · 2022-23
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.