← New Search ↗ Social Card

Petr Staif Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-02-08 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 36 3 8 11 0.306 0.0345 0.0352 0.1040 0.1061
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 41 5 7 12 0.293 0.0330 0.0319 0.0996 0.0963
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 27 2 2 4 0.148
2021-22 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 23 0 1 1 0.043
2020-21 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Worcester State D1 FR 26 2 9 11 0.423
2019-20 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 26 2 9 11 0.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2019-20 · Worcester State
+1247.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17269
Defenseman overall
#2759
Defenseman born in 1999
#4866
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2008-09
0.160 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2014-15
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.