IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Smoliga Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Langley Rivermen BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 — NAHL 29 2 5 7 0.241 0.0858 0.0840 0.2546 0.2493
2019-20 — NAHL 32 2 4 6 0.188 0.0666 0.0666 0.1978 0.1978
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 15 1 3 4 0.267
2022-23 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 19 2 7 9 0.474
2021-22 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 18 1 5 6 0.333
2020-21 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19860
Defenseman overall
#3012
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben King
SUNY Potsdam · 2002-03
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Kile
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2017-18
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Andary
Saint Anselm · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.