IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben King Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-02-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 42 1 7 8 0.191 0.0734 0.0773 0.2768 0.2916
2001-02 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 55 4 19 23 0.418 0.1611 0.1608 0.6077 0.6067
2002-03 Penticton Vees BCHL 48 5 29 34 0.708 0.2729 0.2607 1.0292 0.9830
2003-04 — BCHL 33 1 16 17 0.515 0.1985 0.1808 0.7486 0.6817
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 24 1 3 4 0.167
2004-05 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 17 3 3 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2004-05 · SUNY Potsdam
+75.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6444
Defenseman overall
#802
Defenseman born in 1983
#1474
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Guzzo
Curry · 2007-08
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Kelly
Canton · 2023-24
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.